Iris Dwelling On The Web

Aus Vokipedia
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Ahhhhh, Youtube. That amazing place on the internet, filled with 1000's and 1000's and millions and hundreds of thousands of videos. That lovely dumpster of tutorials and useful data combined with unusual film summaries narrated with TTS, AI generated children videos, compilations of individuals hurting themselves, and EcoLight outdoor so so so so so so many response videos. Internet was once textual content. Hyperlinked textual content. Fan-made pages about essentially the most random stuff. We used to be webmasters, do you remember? This isn't just another trip down nolstalgia lane. There’s a cause I’m thinking about Youtube proper now: We even have the same stuff in there that we used to have on text. And I’m scared of that. And don’t get me mistaken. Movies may be something amazing. Videos require much more knowledge and resources to document and edit. Movies exaggerate biases. We simply don’t hear the same technique to someone uglier or dirtier. Videos are much less accesible.



Movies waste tremendous quantities of bandwidth and storage. Movies have develop into unnecessarily long, and stuffed with adverts. Movies usually are not searchable or easily archivable. Videos are, at present, almost completely hosted on closed social media, like Youtube or TikTok. It’s a really good and entertaining video, and you’ll in all probability learn something from it. I’m going to copy here the transcript of a Youtube video. I wish to extract a summary of this video, written as a regular blog post. Within the quest for power-efficient lighting options, manufacturers have usually had to deal with challenges related to conventional applied sciences. One intriguing example of innovation comes from Basic Electric (GE), which introduced a novel hybrid light bulb combining each compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) and incandescent technologies. The bulb, marketed as "bright from the start," aimed to handle the gradual warm-up time of conventional CFLs by incorporating an incandescent bulb within the CFL structure. This hybrid design allowed for speedy brightness, overcoming a significant downside of early CFL technology.



Before the widespread adoption of LED bulbs, EcoLight outdoor CFLs were hailed for EcoLight lighting his or her energy effectivity however criticized for their slow begin-up instances and unattractive appearance, notably in decorative fixtures. Engineers experimented with numerous methods to conceal or modify the appearance of CFLs, including integrating them into totally different bulb shapes and using reflectors to mimic directional lighting. Nonetheless, enclosing CFL tubes in decorative fixtures posed challenges, as the sealed setting prompted the tubes to run hotter, affecting their performance. Manufacturers devised solutions such as utilizing mercury amalgams to regulate vapor stress and incorporating temperature compensation mechanisms. GE’s hybrid light bulb exemplifies one such solution, seamlessly mixing the instant brightness of incandescent bulbs with the effectivity of CFLs. The bulb comprises a halogen capsule alongside the CFL tube, offering rapid illumination upon startup, earlier than transitioning to full CFL brightness once warmed up. Whereas GE’s hybrid bulb successfully addressed the slow startup difficulty, it additionally highlighted some limitations. For example, in chilly climates, the bulb’s efficiency could possibly be compromised because of the temperature-delicate halogen capsule.



Despite its drawbacks, the hybrid bulb represented an revolutionary strategy to bridging the gap between traditional and power-environment friendly lighting technologies. Nevertheless, with the arrival of inexpensive LED bulbs, the need for such hybrid solutions has diminished. The evolution of lighting technologies showcases the ongoing quest for improvement, usually by means of modern combinations of old and new applied sciences. While options like GE’s hybrid bulb may have been short-term fixes, they demonstrate the inventive drawback-solving spirit driving developments in energy-environment friendly lighting. It’s not excellent. And it’s absolutely not as entertaining as watching him communicate. However in case you needed to "learn" a bit, it’s as efficient as it gets. The original video is 27 minutes long, and in response to the transcript, 4518 words are spoken. With an average reading speed of 220 wpm, in that time 5940 words could possibly be read. That 31% extra. And you would skip strains or soar between paragraphs simply, additional growing your pace. My largest concern with video is this: leisure and knowledge are completely fused collectively.

Meine Werkzeuge
Namensräume

Varianten
Aktionen
Navigation
Werkzeuge