Employment Discrimination Law In The United States

Aus Vokipedia
Version vom 12. März 2025, 01:51 Uhr von DinoLehrer8 (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Employment discrimination law in the United States stems from the typical law, and is codified in numerous state, federal, and regional laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based upon particular characteristics or "secured classifications". The United States Constitution likewise restricts discrimination by federal and state governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the private sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, however has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law restricts discrimination in a variety of locations, consisting of recruiting, working with, job examinations, promo policies, training, payment and disciplinary action. State laws often extend defense to extra classifications or employers.


Under federal work discrimination law, companies generally can not victimize staff members on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] faith, [1] national origin, [1] special needs (physical or mental, including status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills, [9] hereditary info, [10] and citizenship status (for people, long-term citizens, short-lived residents, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law


Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964


Title IX




Constitutional basis


The United States Constitution does not directly attend to work discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to safeguard federal civil servant.


The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has an explicit requirement that the federal government does not deprive people of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due process of the law. It likewise consists of an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly forbids states from breaking a person's rights of due procedure and equivalent protection. In the employment context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by treating employees, previous workers, or job candidates unequally because of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure protection requires that federal government employees have a fair procedural process before they are terminated if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or home interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the provision that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.


Employment discrimination or harassment in the private sector is not unconstitutional because Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically give their respective government the power to enact civil rights laws that use to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to manage a personal company, consisting of civil rights laws, comes from their power to manage all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically pay for some protection from public and personal work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only deal with inequitable treatment by the federal government, including a public employer.


Absent of a provision in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that manage the private sector are usually Constitutional under the "police powers" teaching or the power of a State to enact laws developed to safeguard public health, security and morals. All States must abide by the Federal Civil Rights laws, however States may enact civil rights laws that use additional employment protection.


For example, some State civil rights laws offer protection from employment discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, although such forms of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.


History of federal laws


Federal law governing employment discrimination has actually developed with time.


The Equal Pay Act changed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is implemented by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits companies and unions from paying various wages based upon sex. It does not restrict other discriminatory practices in working with. It offers that where workers carry out equivalent work in the corner needing "equal ability, effort, and responsibility and performed under similar working conditions," they need to be offered equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to companies taken part in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's employees if the business is engaged as a whole in a substantial amount of interstate commerce. [citation needed]

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in lots of more aspects of the work relationship. "Title VII created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to many employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 employees, labor organizations, and employment service. Title VII forbids discrimination based on race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it unlawful for companies to discriminate based upon protected characteristics relating to terms, conditions, and privileges of work. Employment agencies might not discriminate when working with or referring candidates, and labor companies are also forbidden from basing subscription or union categories on race, color, faith, sex, or demo.qkseo.in national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act changed Title VII in 1978, defining that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, giving birth, and associated medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal specialists and subcontractors on account of race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or nationwide origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal specialists". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and changed in 1978 and 1986, restricts companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are almost similar to those described in Title VII, except that the ADEA protects workers in companies with 20 or more workers rather than 15 or more. A staff member is safeguarded from discrimination based on age if he or she is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and forbade mandatory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise offer big pensions). The ADEA contains explicit guidelines for advantage, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of discussion of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history beginning with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy against age discrimination among federal professionals". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal specialists with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial help. [16] It requires affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs reasonable accommodation, and Section 508 needs that electronic and infotech be accessible to disabled workers. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators versus miners who suffer from "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam age veterans by federal specialists". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 restricts employers with more than three staff members from discriminating against anybody (other than an unauthorized immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove prejudiced barriers against qualified people with specials needs, people with a record of a special needs, or people who are considered as having a disability. It restricts discrimination based on real or perceived physical or mental specials needs. It also needs employers to supply affordable lodgings to workers who need them since of an impairment to get a task, perform the necessary functions of a job, or enjoy the benefits and privileges of employment, unless the company can reveal that excessive difficulty will result. There are strict limitations on when an employer can ask disability-related questions or require medical examinations, and all medical details should be dealt with as personal. A disability is specified under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "substantially restricts one or more significant life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, changed in 1993, guarantee all persons equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages offered to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from utilizing individuals' hereditary information when making hiring, shooting, job placement, or promotion decisions. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not clearly consist of sexual orientation and 29 US states do not explicitly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.


LGBT employment discrimination


Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is incorporated by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment protections for LGBT individuals were patchwork; a number of states and localities explicitly restrict harassment and bias in employment decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interpreted Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's identified that transgender staff members were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the security to include sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies show that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have experienced some type of discrimination and harassment at the office. Moreover, a staggering 90 percent of transgender employees report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many individuals in the LGBT community have actually lost their task, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who declares that her employer informed her that her presence may make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]

Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and personal work environments. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in just public work environments. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would intrude on spiritual liberty, despite the fact that these laws are focused more on prejudiced actions, not beliefs. Courts have also determined that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]

State law


State statutes likewise supply extensive security from work discrimination. Some laws extend similar security as offered by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer greater defense to employees of the state or of state contractors.


The following table lists classifications not secured by federal law. Age is included also, since federal law just covers workers over 40.


In addition,


- District of Columbia - matriculation, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Place of birth [76]

Government workers


Title VII also applies to state, federal, local and other public staff members. Employees of federal and state federal governments have extra protections against employment discrimination.


The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal work on the basis of conduct that does not impact job efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has interpreted this as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the interpretation would be expanded to include gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public workers keep their First Amendment rights, whereas private employers have the right to limits workers' speech in specific methods. [93] Public employees keep their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]

Federal staff members who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to take legal action against in the correct federal jurisdiction, which positions a different set of concerns for plaintiffs.


Exceptions


Bona fide occupational credentials


Employers are normally permitted to consider qualities that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are authentic occupational credentials (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the second most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.


The only exception to this guideline is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that police monitoring can match races when needed. For example, if cops are running operations that include confidential informants, or undercover representatives, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, police departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and work with officers that are in proportion to the neighborhood's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not apply in the show business, such as casting for films and tv. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting personnel are allowed to cast characters based on qualities, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination declares for Disparate Treatment are unusual in the show business, particularly in entertainers. [95] This validation is unique to the show business, and does not move to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, employers will use BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense reason in wage spaces between various groups of employees. [96] Cost can be thought about when an employer should stabilize personal privacy and safety worry about the variety of positions that an employer are attempting to fill. [96]

Additionally, consumer preference alone can not be a reason unless there is a privacy or security defense. [96] For example, retail facilities in backwoods can not restrict African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at facilities that deal with kids survivors of sexual assault is allowed.


If an employer were attempting to prove that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there should be a factual basis for believing that all or considerably all members of a class would be unable to carry out the task safely and effectively or that it is unwise to determine qualifications on an individualized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malicious intention does not transform a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory effect. [97] Employers likewise bring the problem to show that a BFOQ is reasonably essential, and a lesser discriminatory option technique does not exist. [98]

Religious employment discrimination


"Religious discrimination is treating people in a different way in their employment since of their faith, their faiths and practices, and/or their ask for accommodation (a modification in a work environment guideline or policy) of their religions and practices. It also consists of treating individuals differently in their work since of their absence of spiritual belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, employers are forbidden from declining to hire an individual based on their religious beliefs- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If a worker thinks that they have actually experienced spiritual discrimination, they ought to address this to the alleged offender. On the other hand, workers are safeguarded by the law for reporting job discrimination and have the ability to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some places in the U.S. now have provisions that ban discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States give particular exemptions in these laws to companies or organizations that are religious or religiously-affiliated, however, to differing degrees in various places, depending upon the setting and the context; some of these have been promoted and others reversed over time.


The most recent and pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the extensive rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many staff members are using spiritual beliefs versus changing the body and preventative medication as a reason to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not enable employees to make an application for spiritual exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are specific requirements for staff members to present evidence that it is a truly held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party


Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly permits discrimination against members of the Communist Party.


Military


The armed force has dealt with criticism for prohibiting females from serving in combat roles. In 2016, however, the law was amended to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the short article posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. writes about the method in which black males were treated in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites provided the African Americans an opportunity to prove themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic site states, nevertheless, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were just allowed to work as servants; their participation was limited to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wished to defend the country they resided in, they were denied the power to do so.


The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the job rights of individuals who voluntarily or involuntarily leave work positions to undertake military service or certain kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law also forbids companies from discriminating versus staff members for previous or present participation or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that give preference to veterans versus non-veterans has been declared to enforce systemic disparate treatment of women due to the fact that there is a vast underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has declined this claim because there was no prejudiced intent towards women in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination


Employment practices that do not straight victimize a secured category may still be illegal if they produce a disparate influence on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have an inequitable effect, unless they relate to task efficiency.


The Act requires the removal of synthetic, approximate, and unnecessary barriers to employment that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that operates to exclude Negroes can not be revealed to be related to job efficiency, it is forbidden, notwithstanding the company's lack of inequitable intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have actually been identified by the EEOC as having a diverse effect on nationwide origin minorities. [108]

When resisting a disparate effect claim that declares age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not need to show necessity; rather, it needs to just reveal that its practice is reasonable. [citation required]

Enforcing entities


The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translates and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are included in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its regulations and guidelines are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wanting to submit suit under Title VII and/or the ADA must exhaust their administrative remedies by filing an administrative problem with the EEOC prior to submitting their suit in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs imposes Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with impairments by federal professionals and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each firm has and imposes its own guidelines that apply to its own programs and to any entities that get financial support. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) implements the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which prohibits discrimination based upon citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces take the role of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT work discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination against individuals with rap sheets in the United States
Racial wage space in the United States
Gender pay space in the United States
Criticism of credit history systems in the United States


References


^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in employment". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans work environment predisposition versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Preference Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the original on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in particular activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Attorney General Of The United States|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the initial on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [long-term dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the initial on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of employers". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with regard to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in employment because of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [irreversible dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Preference Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their hiring practices based on an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare for more US ladies in fight". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the initial on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links


Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to safeguard older employees. Weak to start with, she states that the ADEA has been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.

Meine Werkzeuge
Namensräume

Varianten
Aktionen
Navigation
Werkzeuge