Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

Aus Vokipedia
Version vom 10. Februar 2025, 09:10 Uhr von Santo65E4179611 (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"


Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting


Share this post


Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With approximately date news and complexityzoo.net a little but lively 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to respond to humankind's toughest concerns.


Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain numerous pushing concerns that are less easy to determine. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be better at anticipating the future (and have actually seen some appealing enhancements - term paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.


For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!


Background


Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is actually on the smaller side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months back so we have actually built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we supply the news and tandme.co.uk watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown area to make its best prediction possible.


And Now ... The Important Questions


We positioned the following concerns to our AI and assessed its response. While we have seen forecast enhancements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.


Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity


Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...


First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even welcomed her buddies and household to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.


Some fans are thrilled, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not addressing the speculation straight.


I believe the key points are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the chances and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, thinking about all aspects.


Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 79% chance


No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, wakewiki.de now its simply a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.


Alright, I'm trying to figure out the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it looks like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and method.


Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I likewise require to think of the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might adjust their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles use it.


Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number however possible given their confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the strategy, and the probability that they'll utilize it numerous times, particularly if it's effective early on.


Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?


AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility


While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, utahsyardsale.com it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, yewiki.org waffling back and forth, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.


From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That appears substantial since it shows he's done it previously, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent posts, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could imply he's less most likely to address Trump this time.


However, he's also associated with a feud with Drake, which may give him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a libel fit from Drake, so possibly he bewares about including any controversial tunes in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he might still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.


Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar may feel forced to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations during the halftime program, so there's a danger that such content might be limited or softened.


On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong proceed big stages. He's the first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more innovative liberty. Plus, his past habits suggests he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public performances.


But I also remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, present shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the possibility seems to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.


Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility


Lets be sincere, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.


From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't mean to trigger offense which he really discovered it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.


Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who delights in consuming, particularly with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would engage in a cheeseburger, specifically if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.


Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?


AI Final Prediction: 50% chance


"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and believes anything can happen when that coin enters the air.


Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historical data that might influence this prediction.


First, I go through the posts supplied. They all discuss the historic stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has come up regularly than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a substantial difference.


However, I bear in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases people weigh historic information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must consider whether this historical bias needs to affect the possibility.


After considering it, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr I decide that while the historic data reveals a small choice for tails, it's not statistically substantial enough to move the probability far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists however does not bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.


Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity


We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely believe the same. BUT, its official now because our AI says the opportunities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to fraud on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!


AI Reasoning:


Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite major allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ current games, specifically the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.


But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "absurd." They say there's no evidence of organized bias. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might mean there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some reality to it.


Looking at the short articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, forum.altaycoins.com and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have actually been punished more since 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate fewer charges, right?


...


So, putting it all together, the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero since you can't dismiss every possibility, but extremely not likely.


Summary


There you have it everybody, is it even worth watching the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the video game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.

Meine Werkzeuge
Namensräume

Varianten
Aktionen
Navigation
Werkzeuge