Validity And Reliability Of An Accelerometer-Based Player Tracking Device

Aus Vokipedia
Version vom 11. November 2025, 15:24 Uhr von GladysPie4 (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


The objective of this investigation was to quantify each the reliability and validity of a commercially accessible wearable inertial measuring unit used for athletic tracking and performance analysis. The units demonstrated glorious intradevice reliability and mixed interdevice reliability depending on the course and magnitude of the applied accelerations. Similarly, the devices demonstrated combined accuracy when compared to the reference accelerometer with effects sizes starting from trivial to small. A secondary goal was to compare PlayerLoad™ vs a calculated player load decided utilizing the Cartesian formula reported by the manufacturer. Differences have been discovered between gadgets for both mean PlayerLoad™ and mean peak accelerations with impact sizes ranging from trivial to excessive, depending on particular person models (Figs 2-4). To quantify machine validity, the peak accelerations measured by each machine was in comparison with peak accelerations measured utilizing a calibrated reference accelerometer attached to the shaker table. Following a similar strategy to the method described herein, Boyd et al.



CVs of ≤1.10% for device reported PlayerLoad™ though they didn't report gadget validity. Using a managed laboratory based mostly impression testing protocol, Kelly et al. Similarly, using a shaker table to apply managed, repeatable movement, Kransoff et al. Based on these outcomes, caution should be taken when evaluating PlayerLoad™ or imply peak acceleration between units, particularly when partitioning the results by planes of movement. Therefore, there may be a need for additional analysis to find out acceptable filters, thresholds settings, ItagPro and algorithms to detect occasions so as to properly analyze inertial motion. When comparing the results from the Catapult PlayerLoad™ and calculated player load, we found that PlayerLoad™ is persistently lower by approximately 15%, suggesting that data filtering strategies affect the Catapult reported results. This becomes problematic if the practitioner doesn't know the algorithms utilized by the manufacturers to course of the uncooked data. ‘dwell time,’ or ItagPro minimal effort duration will straight have an effect on the reported athlete efficiency measures.



Therefore, the filtering techniques applied to the uncooked information, the device settings, system firmware, and software program model used during the information collection needs to be reported each by the manufacturer and when research are reported in the literature permitting for each more equitable comparisons between studies and reproducibility of the research. The strategies used in the present investigation can be utilized to supply a baseline evaluation of reliability and validity of wearable devices whose meant use is to quantify measures of athlete physical performance. This methodology employs the applying of highly-controlled, laboratory-based, applied oscillatory movement, and can provide a repeatable, verified, utilized movement validated utilizing a calibrated reference accelerometer. This type of managed laboratory testing can enable for the willpower of the boundaries of efficiency, reliability, and validity of devices employed to guage bodily performance. While this characterization method supplies a performance baseline, the use of these gadgets in an applied setting sometimes entails placing the device in a vest worn by the athlete.



As such, the interaction and relative movement of each machine with the vest and the interaction and relative movement of the vest with the athlete will introduce an extra stage of variability in the device recorded data. Further investigation is required to accurately characterize these interactions in order to provide a more complete description of overall system software variability. As the use of wearable devices turns into more ubiquitous, normal methods of device reported knowledge verification and validation ought to be required. Standard check strategies with calibrated reference units needs to be used as a basis of comparison to machine reported measures. Also, since one of many models needed to be faraway from the study as it was an outlier, and ItagPro several other units showed poor between-system reliability, we recommend periodic gadget calibration so as to attenuate the error of measurement and to identify malfunctioning models. A doable limitation of the current examine is that whereas the experimental protocol was designed to attenuate extraneous vibrations and off-axis error, sources of error could embody variations in gadget hardware including accelerometer sensitivities and orientation of sensors throughout the device. As well as, slight misalignments of the attachment of the units to the shaker table might result in small variations in reported accelerations and derived PlayerLoad™ metrics.

Meine Werkzeuge
Namensräume

Varianten
Aktionen
Navigation
Werkzeuge