Our New Deepseek-based AI Says

Aus Vokipedia
Version vom 10. Februar 2025, 00:18 Uhr von Santo65E4179611 (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche


Our AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"


Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting


Share this post


Nobody can forecast the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to address mankind's hardest concerns.


Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing questions that are less simple to pin down. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at forecasting the future (and have seen some interesting improvements - term paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.


For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!


Background


Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months earlier so we have developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified territory to make its best prediction possible.


And Now ... The Important Questions


We posed the following questions to our AI and assessed its action. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop betting at your own danger.


Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility


Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...


First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been helpful of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even welcomed her friends and household to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.


Some fans are delighted, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not resolving the speculation straight.


I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the chances and his reactions recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all factors.


Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility


No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" move, now its just a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Looks like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.


Alright, I'm trying to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand what precisely a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback, wiki.rrtn.org in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.


Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The post discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I likewise require to believe about the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are aware of the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.


Considering that more than five looks like a substantial number but possible provided their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the likelihood that they'll use it several times, particularly if it works early on.


Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?


AI Final Prediction: 65% chance


While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.


From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems substantial since it reveals he's done it in the past, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current posts, it discusses that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That might imply he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.


However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which may provide him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any questionable songs in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.


Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar might feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a threat that such material may be limited or softened.


On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant carry on big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might give him more creative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public performances.


But I likewise remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the likelihood appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.


Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility


Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its forecast? Appears like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.


From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to trigger offense and that he in fact found it funny himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.


Looking at the articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who takes pleasure in consuming, especially with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the circumstance is on screen for an event.


Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?


AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity


"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and thinks anything can occur when that coin enters the air.


Okay, addsub.wiki so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that may influence this prediction.


First, I read through the articles supplied. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually come up more often than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a minor edge, however it's not a substantial difference.


However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is typically considered random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases individuals weigh historical information even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I ought to think about whether this historic bias should affect the possibility.


After believing about it, I choose that while the historical data shows a minor preference for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists however does not bypass the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.


Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity


We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably think the same. BUT, its official now because our AI states the opportunities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!


AI Reasoning:


Okay, so I'm trying to determine the probability that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that discuss conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable hire recent video games, especially the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.


But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "outrageous." They state there's no evidence of organized predisposition. That's a strong declaration from the individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some fact to it.


Taking a look at the articles, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more given that 2022. That's intriguing because if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?


...


So, putting all of it together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't dismiss every possibility, however very not likely.


Summary


There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the video game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hi, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, at least it can gain from this.

Meine Werkzeuge
Namensräume

Varianten
Aktionen
Navigation
Werkzeuge