Our New Deepseek-based AI Says

Aus Vokipedia
(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „<br>Our [https://www.blythandwright.co.uk AI] says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br><br><br>[http://git.suxiniot.com Super Bowl] forecasts from our …“)
 
K
 
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
<br>Our  [https://www.blythandwright.co.uk AI] says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br><br><br>[http://git.suxiniot.com Super Bowl] forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based [https://gmdatatrust.org.uk AI] trained to be much better at forecasting<br><br><br>Share this post<br> <br><br>Nobody can [https://www.wgwelchllc.com forecast] the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training [https://kurz-steuerkanzlei.de AI] to [https://patioscenes.com provide] it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our [https://ukcarers.co.uk AI] is [http://silvanaparrucchiera.it boldly anticipating] the unforeseeable. Join us as we [http://www.glcmc.org attempt] to [https://xelliun.com address mankind's] [http://ns1.vird.ru hardest] [http://terrianchess.com concerns].<br><br><br>[https://www.worlddiary.co Super Bowl] Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an [https://satstore.kz over-under] of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of [https://movie.actor pressing questions] that are less simple to pin down. Our business, [http://www.lebelleclinic.com Lightning Rod] Labs, has been mining questions from places like [https://www.bambamsbbq.com polymarket].com and [https://hotrod-tour-mainz.com training] a big language model to be better at [https://mytischi-city.ru forecasting] the future (and have seen some interesting improvements - [http://cover.gnu-darwin.org term paper] inbound). This week we turned its cold, [https://constructingexcellence.org.uk computing] eye at the [https://www.passadforbundet.se Super Bowl] to see if it can offer us some [https://www.atiempo.eu insight] into the finer points of what we can [https://www.apkjobs.site anticipate] this Sunday.<br><br><br>For more [http://diyent.com updates] from the [http://shkola.mitrofanovka.ru AI] world sign up for my [http://secondlinejazzband.com newsletter]!<br><br><br>Background<br><br><br>Our [https://yesmouse.com AI] is a 14 billion [https://besaferadon.com criterion design] which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and [http://milliinfo.az trained utilizing] 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months earlier so we have [https://saintleger73.fr developed] an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the [http://suvenir51.ru AI] [https://kisem.org reasons] its way through unidentified territory to make its best [http://bkh-ie.co.kr prediction] possible.<br><br><br>And Now ... The Important Questions<br><br><br>We posed the following [https://www.acaclip.com questions] to our [http://essentialfma.com.au AI] and [https://mfweddings.com assessed] its action. While we have seen [http://krivr.com prediction improvements] from our training, [https://constructingexcellence.org.uk utilize] these price quotes for [http://www.hodsoncranehire.co.uk prop betting] at your own danger.<br><br><br>Will Travis Kelce [https://lindsayclarkblinds.co.uk propose] to Taylor Swift after the [https://essencialponto.com.br Super Bowl]?<br><br><br>[https://melondesign.nl AI] Final Prediction: 5% possibility<br><br><br>Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our [https://www.mattkuchta.com AI] believes Taylor and [https://tourengine.com Travis' relationship] is rock strong, however a little too personal for a [https://www.crivian2.it post-Super Bowl] proposition. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an [http://stingraybeachinn.com awkward proposal] ...<br><br><br>First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the [https://lindsayclarkblinds.co.uk articles]. Travis has actually [http://pumping.co.kr remained] in a [https://betterwithbell.com relationship] with Taylor because 2023. He's a big [http://guilanedu.ir football] star, and she's been [https://www.equipoalianza.com.ar helpful] of his profession, [http://noppes-mausezahn.de attending] his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even [https://knowledge-experts.co welcomed] her friends and household to the Super Bowl, [https://advguides.com revealing] her [https://www.cyrfitness.fr commitment].<br><br><br>Some fans are delighted, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how [https://urban1.com ideal Travis] is for Taylor. However, the [https://groups.chat couple appears] to be keeping their relationship personal and not [http://labiscapokerclub.altervista.org resolving] the speculation straight.<br><br><br>I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his [https://golgi.ru incredibly elusive] [https://jamesrodriguezclub.com responses]. While he's [https://www.jr-it-services.de3000 plainly] in a relationship and the [https://www.aguasdearuanda.org.br Super Bowl] is an important event, the chances and his reactions recommend it's more of a [http://rets2021.blogs.rice.edu possibility] instead of a [http://imen-ammari.tn certainty]. I [https://www.cruzeo.fr 'd approximate] a low possibility, maybe around 5%, [http://kaminskilukasz.com thinking] about all [http://www.jobteck.co.in factors].<br><br><br>Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the [https://rescewe.org super bowl]?<br><br><br>[https://notitia.tv AI] Final Prediction: 79% possibility<br><br><br>No [https://www.investorsaham.id Jason Kelce] hasn't [https://atlashrsolutions.com stopped] the Eagles from [https://coaching-lookrevelation.fr utilizing] their signature "tush-push" move, now its just a different front-tush being pressed. Will an [http://skrzaty.net.pl AI] comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an [http://buat.edu.in AI] even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) [http://www.onturk.com Josh Allen's] similar attempts? Looks like our [http://www.dvls.tv AI] [http://www.localpay.co.kr believes] they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and [https://animastudio.gr strong legs] and lower body (Does our [http://lolabeancaking.com AI] have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.<br><br><br>Alright, I'm trying to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the [https://git.lazyka.ru Super Bowl]. First, I need to [http://www.aiki-evolution.jp understand] what [http://explodingfreedomcentralcity.shoutwiki.com precisely] a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback,  [https://wiki.rrtn.org/wiki/index.php/User:Wilton62X9544 wiki.rrtn.org] in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and [http://www.portaldeenergia.cl lower body] [https://karmadishoom.com strength] to press off [https://newarkfashionforward.com protectors]. It's [https://kurz-steuerkanzlei.de compared] to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs [http://essentialfma.com.au strength] and method.<br><br><br>[http://www.acadiadesignnw.com Article] 3 dives into the [https://inway-pro.com physics] of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The [https://git.unicom.studio post discusses] that the Eagles have a 90% [https://www.telewolves.com success rate] with this method, which is pretty high. ... I likewise require to believe about the [http://jcorporation.kr protective methods] of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are aware of the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense appropriately, which could either [https://test1.tlogsir.com increase] or reduce the [http://marksrelatives.com variety] of times the Eagles use it.<br><br><br>Considering that more than five looks like a substantial number but possible provided their self-confidence, I would [https://decoengineering.it approximate] a likelihood around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, [http://www.mytaxfiler.com self-confidence] in the technique, and the likelihood that they'll use it several times, particularly if it works early on.<br><br><br>Will Kendrick Lamar [https://info.ikyc.eu diss Donald] Trump throughout the [https://olca2021.wpengine.com halftime] [https://www.apkjobs.site program] [https://servitrafick.es efficiency]?<br><br><br>[http://101.42.90.121:3000 AI] Final Prediction: 65% chance<br><br><br>While our [https://www.janaelmarketing.com AI] may not resemble us when it [https://catalogodecalendarios.es pertains] to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on [https://www.crivian2.it Kendrick Lamar]. It was pretty uncertain, [https://www.m-idea-l.com waffling backward] and forward, but in the end it thinks [https://www.acaclip.com Kendrick] isn't going to back down from a fight.<br><br><br>From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous [http://www.leganavalesantamarinella.it halftime] show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems [http://bennettscabinets.com substantial] since it [https://www.j1595.com reveals] he's done it in the past, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current posts, it [http://139.159.151.633000 discusses] that Lamar is moving away from [https://bloghub.in.net political statements] and [https://toeibill.com focusing] more on [https://convia.gt individual expression]. That might imply he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.<br><br><br>However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which may [http://as-style.net provide] him [https://you.stonybrook.edu factors] to make some public declarations, even if they're not [https://advokatveurope.com political]. Another point is the [https://newarkfashionforward.com legal issues] [http://hajepine.com surrounding] his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so maybe he bewares about consisting of any [https://lozanoinc.com questionable songs] in the [https://hardcandievents.com efficiency]. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's [https://ba-mechanics.ch uncertain].<br><br><br>Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a [http://aor.locatelligroup.eu prominent] occasion, Lamar might [https://r18av.net feel obliged] to make a [https://tubeseen.com statement]. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the [http://www.tehranjarrah.com halftime] show, so there's a threat that such [https://www.eworkplace.com material] may be [http://www.empowernet.com.au limited] or softened.<br><br><br>On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making [https://jufafoods.com vibrant] carry on big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to [http://dw-deluxe.ru heading] the halftime show, which might give him more creative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in [http://www.unimogsound.be public performances].<br><br><br>But I likewise [http://ehm.dk remember reading] that Lamar expressed [https://blogs.wellesley.edu fatigue] about [https://feelhospitality.com criticizing] Trump, comparing it to [https://www.hmd.org.tr beating] a [https://www.whatisprediabetes.com dead horse]. That could show he's less [http://www.mytaxfiler.com inspired] to [https://pimaendocrinology.com raise Trump] this time around, particularly if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, [http://kvachlum.nl weighing] all [http://my-speedworld.de factors-past] behavior, present shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the [https://thewion.com occasion's context-the] [https://zahnarzt-eckelmann.de likelihood appears] to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.<br><br><br>Will Andy [https://golgi.ru Reid consume] a [http://bkh-ie.co.kr cheeseburger] on screen after the [https://vlevs.com super bowl]?<br><br><br>[https://agenciaconectaonline.com.br AI] Final Prediction: 25% possibility<br><br><br>Lets be sincere, [https://lsvmetals.com Andy Reid] [https://www.hmd.org.tr likes cheeseburgers]. And who does not? Will the fact that our [http://sonntagszeichner.de AI] has never ever tasted the [https://antaresshop.de juicy deliciousness] of a fresh hamburger taint its [https://www.bochum-bellt.de forecast]? Appears like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will [https://jazielmusic.com taste Angus] Beef.<br><br><br>From the short articles, I see that [https://landseminare.de Terry Bradshaw] made a joke about [https://bbs.yhmoli.com Andy Reid] eating a [https://www.springvalleywood.com cheeseburger] during a [http://175.25.51.903000 Super Bowl] event. [https://www.shadesofchic.net Bradshaw] later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to [https://xn----8sbicjmbdfi2b8a3a.xn--p1ai trigger offense] and that he in fact found it funny himself. [https://marcantoniodesigns.com Reid appeared] to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.<br><br><br>Looking at the articles, it points out that [http://secondlinejazzband.com Andy Reid] is a [https://tinderdrinkgame.com food lover] and loves [https://social.midnightdreamsreborns.com cheeseburgers]. There's a post specifically about his love for food, which [http://iamsailing.blog.free.fr recommends] that he's a person who takes [https://wakeuptaylor.boardhost.com pleasure] in consuming, especially with his group. So, if there were plans to [http://www.cataniacorse.it commemorate] after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the [https://thegoodvibessociety.nl circumstance] is on screen for an event.<br><br><br>Will the opening [http://www.leganavalesantamarinella.it coin toss] in the [http://www.shaunhooke.com Super Bowl] be tails?<br><br><br>[https://wildflecken-camps.de AI] Final Prediction: 50% opportunity<br><br><br>"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the [https://source.lug.org.cn machines] !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been [https://newsplus.org.in forecasting] the coin toss and 53% are [https://germanjob.eu forecasting heads] due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 extremely bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. [http://svastarica5.blog.rs Statistically] incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our [https://speakitinc.com AI] can't be [https://christianswhocursesometimes.com deceived] and thinks anything can occur when that coin enters the air.<br><br><br>Okay,  [http://addsub.wiki/index.php/User:ConnorLEstrange addsub.wiki] so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the opening [https://gogs.les-refugies.fr coin toss] in the [https://homecomfortoptions.com Super Bowl] will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that may [https://www.av-heaven.co.uk influence] this prediction.<br><br><br>First, I read through the [https://directsearch.global articles supplied]. They all [https://storytravell.ru discuss] the [https://www.apkjobs.site historic statistics] of [http://jasimalgosia-przedszkole.pl Super Bowl] coin tosses. It [https://blogs.wellesley.edu appears] like tails has actually come up more often than [https://www.koelondon.com heads historically]. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, [http://git.lmh5.com based simply] on history, tails has a minor edge, however it's not a substantial difference.<br><br><br>However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is [https://home-access-center.com typically] considered random. The small [https://me.eng.kmitl.ac.th historic edge] for tails might be due to chance. But when making predictions, in some cases [http://metroplus.gov.co individuals weigh] [http://129.211.184.1848090 historical] information even if it's not [https://repo.myapps.id statistically considerable]. So, I ought to think about whether this [https://cliftonhollow.com historic] bias should affect the possibility.<br><br><br>After believing about it, I choose that while the [https://evtopnews.com historical data] shows a minor preference for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists however does not bypass the truth that each toss is an [https://www.basqueculinaryworldprize.com independent] 50/50 event.<br><br><br>Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the [http://www.kerstinwemanthornell.se Super Bowl]?<br><br><br>[https://kingdommentorships.com AI] Final Prediction: 1% opportunity<br><br><br>We get it, you think the refs like [https://www.reccolab.com.au Patrick Mahomes] and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't [https://www.hl-manufaktur.de inject pro-Kansas] City training data) I would probably think the same. BUT, its official now because our [https://www.paulabrusky.com AI] states the [http://gopswydminy.pl opportunities] are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a [https://www.springvalleywood.com nationwide] scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!<br><br><br>[https://adopstrends.com AI] Reasoning:<br><br><br>Okay, so I'm trying to [https://www.jurgadream.com determine] the [https://soliliquio.com probability] that the [https://finitipartners.com referees] will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious [https://revistareconcavo.com.br allegation]. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that [https://judithshufro.com discuss conspiracy] theories suggesting [https://git.entryrise.com referees] are [https://notitia.tv prejudiced] towards the Chiefs. People are [http://home.mbconsult.info indicating] some [https://dobetterhub.com questionable hire] recent video games, especially the AFC National championship. That does appear to trigger some [https://coco-systems.nl uncertainty]. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their [https://ashi-kome.com team loses] due to what they [http://bkh-ie.co.kr perceive] as [https://fullpicturefinancial.com bad officiating].<br><br><br>But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "outrageous." They state there's no evidence of [https://scondo-labs.de organized predisposition]. That's a strong declaration from the [http://skrzaty.net.pl individuals] in charge. If they're denying it, it might suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some fact to it.<br><br><br>Taking a look at the articles, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that [https://namdolure.com analytical analysis] doesn't reveal any pattern of [http://home.mbconsult.info favoritism] towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information [https://xn----8sbicjmbdfi2b8a3a.xn--p1ai reveals] the Chiefs have actually been penalized more given that 2022. That's intriguing because if they were getting unique treatment, you might [http://ladyhub.org anticipate] less penalties, right?<br><br><br>...<br><br><br>So, putting all of it together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the [https://brezovik.me Super Bowl] is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't [http://androidturkiye.awardspace.biz dismiss] every possibility, however very not likely.<br><br><br>Summary<br><br><br>There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the video game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the [http://zumaart.sk video game] turns out before we [http://111.160.87.828004 unleash] this upon the [http://kineticelement.rocks stock exchange]. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hi, if it turns out our [http://secondlinejazzband.com AI] was incorrect about everything, at least it can gain from this.<br>
+
<br>Our new Deepseek-based [http://www.2783friends.com AI] states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br><br><br>Super Bowl predictions from our [http://easywordpower.org brand-new Deepseek-based] [https://www.teranganature.com AI] [http://git.jiankangyangfan.com3000 trained] to be much better at forecasting<br><br><br>Share this post<br><br><br>No one can anticipate the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training [http://dpc.pravkamchatka.ru AI] to provide it its [http://barkadahollywood.com finest shot]. With approximately date news and a little however lively 14 Billion criterion model, our [https://git.chir.rs AI] is boldly predicting the [http://120.77.209.1763000 unpredictable]. Join us as we try to address humanity's [https://music.busai.me hardest] questions.<br><br><br>Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The [http://www.hakyoun.co.kr spread presently] sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain lots of [http://cadeborde.fr pushing questions] that are less easy to select. Our business, [https://git.randomstar.io Lightning Rod] Labs, has actually been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a big [http://solutionsss.de language design] to be much better at [https://www.astrahangel.ro anticipating] the future (and have actually seen some [https://www.caricatureart.com intriguing improvements] - research paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the [http://borovljany.by Super Bowl] to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.<br><br><br>For more updates from the [https://mosrite65.com AI] world [https://orandyfitness.com subscribe] to my [http://www.stefanogoffi.it newsletter]!<br><br><br>Background<br><br><br>Our [http://ribewiki.dk AI] is a 14 billion criterion design which is really on the smaller sized side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from [https://mac-trans.pl numerous] months earlier so we have actually built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we supply the news and watch as the [https://ilfuoriporta.it AI] reasons its way through [https://travellers-link.com unidentified] area to make its finest prediction possible.<br><br><br>And Now ... The Important Questions<br><br><br>We postured the following questions to our [https://superappsocial.com AI] and determined its response. While we have actually seen [https://www.eadvisor.it forecast enhancements] from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.<br><br><br>Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?<br><br><br>[https://lkcareers.wisdomlanka.com AI] Final Prediction: 5% opportunity<br><br><br>And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our [https://peekz.eu AI] believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a [http://huntandswain.co.uk post-Super Bowl] proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an [https://controlatuaforo.es uncomfortable proposition] ...<br><br><br>First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a huge [http://imen-ammari.tn football] star, and she's been [http://www.it9aak.it helpful] of his career, [https://hausarzt-schneider-spranger.de attending] his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, showing her [http://wiki.ru commitment].<br><br><br>Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially [https://www.karinasuarez.com offered remarks] Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not [https://knightcomputers.biz addressing] the [https://scottsdaledentalarts.com speculation straight].<br><br><br>I believe the bottom lines are the [http://lagottoromagnolo-ribaty.cz speculation] and his incredibly elusive . While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the odds and his [http://www.diosiautosiskola.hu responses recommend] it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, perhaps around 5%, considering all [https://fehervarrugby.hu aspects].<br><br><br>Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?<br><br><br>[https://followmypic.com AI] Final Prediction: 79% opportunity<br><br><br>No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a different front-tush being pushed. Will an [https://git.randomstar.io AI] [https://www.avglobaladvisory.com understand] what a "tush-push" is? Does an [https://amorlab.org AI] even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? [https://evove.io Appears] like our [https://oliveiramortgages.com AI] thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600[http://moshiachmatters.org -pound squat] and [http://dagashi.websozai.jp strong legs] and lower body (Does our [http://sq.alssunnah.com AI] have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this [https://www.globaltubedaddy.com video game].<br><br><br>Alright, I'm [https://fedornesterov.com attempting] to find out the [https://grizzly-adhesive.ua likelihood] that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to [https://www.xtrasmile.co.za understand] just what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it looks like it's a [https://dreamcorpsllc.com technique] where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs [https://totalchangeprogram.com strength] and method.<br><br><br>[https://www.wwv.rstca.com.np Article] 3 dives into the [https://seevez.net physics] of the "tush-push." It [https://totalchangeprogram.com explains] how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I also [http://sme.amuz.krakow.pl require] to think of the [http://gitea.rageframe.com defensive methods] of the Chiefs. If the [https://allpcworld.com Chiefs understand] the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might change their defense appropriately, which might either increase or  [http://it-viking.ch/index.php/User:Ivy1903516915 it-viking.ch] decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.<br><br><br>Considering that more than five appears like a significant number however possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, [https://mandrake.cz self-confidence] in the method, and the probability that they'll utilize it a number of times, especially if it's reliable early on.<br><br><br>Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?<br><br><br>[http://www.connectingonline.com.ar AI] Final Prediction: 65% chance<br><br><br>While our [https://195.216.35.156 AI] may not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.<br><br><br>From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous [http://47.108.78.21828999 halftime] show when Trump was present in 2018. That [https://www.blaskapelle-rohrbach.de appears] significant since it shows he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on [http://klin-jem.ru personal expression]. That might mean he's less most likely to attend to Trump this time.<br><br><br>However, he's likewise associated with a fight with Drake, which may give him [https://www.agetoage4.com factors] to make some public statements, even if they're not [http://millerstreetstudios.com political]. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation suit from Drake, so perhaps he's careful about consisting of any controversial songs in the performance. But given that he won the [http://parafiasuchozebry.pl Grammys] for that track, he may still want to [http://yogamitmurat.de perform] it, even if it's [https://ones-o-property.com uncertain].<br><br><br>Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar might [https://fysol.com.br feel forced] to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the [https://htovkrav.com halftime] show, so there's a risk that such [http://mompussy.xyz material] may be restricted or softened.<br><br><br>On the other hand, Lamar has a [https://git.ides.club performance history] of making [https://aegfuels.com strong moves] on big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which may offer him more [https://www.trlej.com innovative flexibility]. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.<br><br><br>But I likewise remember reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to [http://saadellaoui.fr beating] a dead horse. That might show he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's [http://jicc.kr concentrating] on his feud with Drake. In summary,  [https://dokuwiki.stream/wiki/User:ChassidyMatthes dokuwiki.stream] weighing all [https://snilli.is factors-past] habits, present shifts in focus, legal problems, and the event's context-the likelihood appears to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.<br><br><br>Will Andy Reid consume a [http://landingpage309.com cheeseburger] on screen after the very bowl?<br><br><br>[http://bricklaer.ru AI] Final Prediction: 25% possibility<br><br><br>Lets be honest, Andy Reid [https://www.leaperlanders.it likes cheeseburgers]. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our [http://crottobelvedere.com AI] has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres somewhat of an [http://farmboyfl.com opportunity] that if the [https://weekendfds.com chiefs taste] victory, Andy will [https://polapetro.co.id taste Angus] Beef.<br><br><br>From the posts, I see that [https://hortpeople.com Terry Bradshaw] made a joke about [https://choosy.cc Andy Reid] consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't suggest to trigger offense and that he really found it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.<br><br><br>Looking at the posts, it [https://mkala-koncert.ru mentions] that [http://tumi.lamolina.edu.pe Andy Reid] is a [https://hsaccountingandtaxation.com food lover] and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who [https://mcgit.place delights] in consuming, specifically with his team. So,  [https://pipewiki.org/wiki/index.php/User:MarshallBrazier pipewiki.org] if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the [http://plenaserigrafia.com.br circumstance] is on screen for an event.<br><br><br>Will the opening [https://ppid.ptun-mataram.go.id coin toss] in the Super Bowl be tails?<br><br><br>[https://www.intotheblue.gr AI] Final Prediction: 50% possibility<br><br><br>"Tails never ever fails?" You can't [http://donero-i.com deceive] the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been [https://foley-al.wesellportablebuildings.com anticipating] the [https://redevabilite.bj coin toss] and 53% are [https://aplyjob.com predicting heads] due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our [https://www.tlhealthwellnesswriter.com AI] can't be tricked and [https://mach-metall.at believes] anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.<br><br><br>Okay, so I'm [http://xrkorea.kr attempting] to figure out the probability that the opening [http://blogs.scarsdaleschools.org coin toss] in the [https://www.exobody.be Super Bowl] will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is [http://rodherring.com expected] to be 50/50, however there's some [https://feelgoodtravels.net historic data] that may influence this [https://xn--9i1b14lcmc51s.kr forecast].<br><br><br>First, I review the posts provided. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has turned up more [https://travellers-link.com frequently] than [https://iceprintanddesign.co.uk heads traditionally]. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the [https://aqualongo.pt outcome] 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, [http://adventure.vonbrandt.se based simply] on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a [https://tcwo.ca substantial distinction].<br><br><br>However, I keep in mind that the result of a [https://www.rlfwc.com coin toss] is usually thought about random. The small [http://www.omainiche.org historical edge] for tails could be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, in some cases [https://pswishyouwereheretravel.com people weigh] historical data even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I ought to consider whether this historical predisposition must influence the [http://barkadahollywood.com possibility].<br><br><br>After considering it, I choose that while the historic data reveals a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the [http://snakepowa.free.fr likelihood] far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the [https://snilli.is slight historic] edge exists however doesn't bypass the fact that each toss is an [http://www.taxilm.sk independent] 50/50 event.<br><br><br>Will the referees cheat to assist the [https://www.heatersbullpen.com Chiefs win] the Super Bowl?<br><br><br>[http://aizu-soba.com AI] Final Prediction: 1% possibility<br><br><br>We get it, you think the refs like [https://www.gianninicucine.com Patrick Mahomes] and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in [https://travellers-link.com Kansas City] (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its official now since our [https://www.uchmet.ru AI] says the [https://snilli.is possibilities] are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it [https://portalwe.net pertains] to scams on a [https://www.therosholive.com nationwide] scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to [http://diabetic-virus-action.net win fair] and square!<br><br><br>[http://ukasz.rubikon.pl AI] Reasoning:<br><br><br>Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the [https://pswishyouwereheretravel.com referees] will cheat to assist the [https://www.kennovation-services.com Chiefs win] the [https://postonseo.com Super Bowl]. Hmm, that's a pretty [https://clearcreek.a2hosted.com severe allegation]. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that talk about conspiracy theories suggesting [https://totalchangeprogram.com referees] are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful calls in recent video games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does appear to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get [https://videonexus.ca frustrated] when their group loses due to what they view as [https://manilall.com bad officiating].<br><br><br>But then I check out that the NFL Referees [https://www.avvocatibbc.it Association] and  [http://www.annunciogratis.net/author/caitlincarl annunciogratis.net] the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both [https://dev-members.writeappreviews.com dismissed] these claims as "outrageous" and "absurd." They state there's no evidence of [https://mercedes-world.com methodical bias]. That's a strong [https://www.heatersbullpen.com declaration] from [https://caboconciergeltd.com individuals] in charge. If they're denying it, it may suggest there's no [http://informadorelpais.com real basis] or they would have [https://www.christoph-neumann.info resolved] it differently if there was some fact to it.<br><br><br>Looking at the short articles, [https://www.heesah.com numerous sources] like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis does not show any [https://www.uapisnya.com.ua pattern] of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, [http://www.diosiautosiskola.hu Mike Pereira] from FOX said [https://knightcomputers.biz data reveals] the Chiefs have been punished more since 2022. That's interesting due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate fewer penalties, right?<br><br><br>...<br><br><br>So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably [http://barkadahollywood.com extremely low]. Maybe not zero because you can't eliminate every possibility, however very not likely.<br><br><br>Summary<br><br><br>There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the game still? I [https://indienheute.de guess I'll] need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we [http://sportlinenutrition.ru unleash] this upon the stock market. [https://gavrysh.org.ua Fingers crossed] for a good video game! And hi, if it turns out our [http://www.twokingscomics.com AI] was [https://kalymnos.gov.gr incorrect] about everything, at least it can gain from this.<br>

Aktuelle Version vom 2. Juni 2025, 16:35 Uhr


Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"


Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting


Share this post


No one can anticipate the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a little however lively 14 Billion criterion model, our AI is boldly predicting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to address humanity's hardest questions.


Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain lots of pushing questions that are less easy to select. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be much better at anticipating the future (and have actually seen some intriguing improvements - research paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.


For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!


Background


Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is really on the smaller sized side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months earlier so we have actually built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified area to make its finest prediction possible.


And Now ... The Important Questions


We postured the following questions to our AI and determined its response. While we have actually seen forecast enhancements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.


Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity


And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...


First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been helpful of his career, attending his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her family and friends to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.


Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not addressing the speculation straight.


I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive . While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the odds and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, perhaps around 5%, considering all aspects.


Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity


No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.


Alright, I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand just what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.


Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I also require to think of the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might change their defense appropriately, which might either increase or it-viking.ch decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.


Considering that more than five appears like a significant number however possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll utilize it a number of times, especially if it's reliable early on.


Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?


AI Final Prediction: 65% chance


While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.


From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears significant since it shows he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That might mean he's less most likely to attend to Trump this time.


However, he's likewise associated with a fight with Drake, which may give him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation suit from Drake, so perhaps he's careful about consisting of any controversial songs in the performance. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.


Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material may be restricted or softened.


On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong moves on big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which may offer him more innovative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.


But I likewise remember reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, dokuwiki.stream weighing all factors-past habits, present shifts in focus, legal problems, and the event's context-the likelihood appears to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.


Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility


Lets be honest, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.


From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't suggest to trigger offense and that he really found it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.


Looking at the posts, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who delights in consuming, specifically with his team. So, pipewiki.org if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for an event.


Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?


AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility


"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.


Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historic data that may influence this forecast.


First, I review the posts provided. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has turned up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a substantial distinction.


However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The small historical edge for tails could be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, in some cases people weigh historical data even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I ought to consider whether this historical predisposition must influence the possibility.


After considering it, I choose that while the historic data reveals a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists however doesn't bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.


Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?


AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility


We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably think the very same. BUT, its official now since our AI says the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!


AI Reasoning:


Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that talk about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful calls in recent video games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does appear to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.


But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and annunciogratis.net the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "absurd." They state there's no evidence of methodical bias. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it may suggest there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some fact to it.


Looking at the short articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been punished more since 2022. That's interesting due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate fewer penalties, right?


...


So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero because you can't eliminate every possibility, however very not likely.


Summary


There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hi, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, at least it can gain from this.

Meine Werkzeuge
Namensräume

Varianten
Aktionen
Navigation
Werkzeuge