<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.vokipedia.de/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="de">
		<id>http://www.vokipedia.de/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=FranklynTier</id>
		<title>Vokipedia - Benutzerbeiträge [de]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.vokipedia.de/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=FranklynTier"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.vokipedia.de/index.php?title=Spezial:Beitr%C3%A4ge/FranklynTier"/>
		<updated>2026-05-04T13:26:24Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Benutzerbeiträge</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.23</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.vokipedia.de/index.php?title=California_Sports_Betting:_Endorsements_Present_Versus_Proposition_26</id>
		<title>California Sports Betting: Endorsements Present Versus Proposition 26</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.vokipedia.de/index.php?title=California_Sports_Betting:_Endorsements_Present_Versus_Proposition_26"/>
				<updated>2026-04-28T14:09:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;FranklynTier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;On Friday, the No on 26 campaign, mostly sponsored by California's card room owners, released a statement revealing that &amp;quot;every significant California news…“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;On Friday, the No on 26 campaign, mostly sponsored by California's card room owners, released a statement revealing that &amp;quot;every significant California newspaper&amp;quot; is opposed to the legislation sponsored by a broad coalition of native people.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The release included excerpts of editorials from the following major news outlets:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Los Angeles Times&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;San Franciso Chronicle&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;San Diego Union-Tribune&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sacramento Bee&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;San Jose Mercury News&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plus a handful of other papers from across California that have actually asked voters to decline Proposition 26, which would allow in-person legal sports betting at tribal gambling establishments and racetracks.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The bill is backed by a coalition of 51 native tribes looking for to maintain their long history of control over video gaming in the state, which saw more than $200 million in TV ads assaulting the competing sportsbook legislation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of course, a lot of these exact same [https://www.kornerspot.com/@shanonarent086 newspapers] have also been encouraging their readers, in a lot more strict terms, to vote no on the online sportsbook-backed Prop 27 - the No on 27 statement is merely the current in what has been a long summer of dueling attack ads ... which resulted in alienating California voters completely.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;California voters turned off by ads on both sides&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The overall ad spend for and against Props 26 and 27 has topped $500 million - a brand-new record with respect to state legislative procedures in the U.S. The cash was mainly lost, however, as Californians were put off by the saturation of TV campaigns where sportsbooks and native tribes were constantly attacking each others' trustworthiness.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The bitter legal project has actually seen the sportsbooks missing out on the mark by labeling Prop 27 as a &amp;quot;Homeless and Mental Health Solutions&amp;quot; expense - owing to funds that would be assigned to such initiatives from the 10% tax on [https://cute.link/magdalenafitzs operators' revenues] - however voters may well have actually felt insulted by a deceptive advertising project that stopped working to mention the primary intent of Prop 27 - to legislate online sports betting.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That was definitely the analysis put [https://www.culpidon.fr/@fydryder136479 forward] by many members of the No camp. Kendra Lewis, Executive Director of the [http://49.50.103.174/steffenarroyo4 Sacramento Housing] Alliance, criticized operators' intentions in support of the No on 27 campaign.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Prop 27 is a fundamentally flawed measure that will make the homeless crisis even worse in California,&amp;quot; said Lewis. &amp;quot;The fact that Prop 27's backers are utilizing this extremely real humanitarian crisis to sell their deceptive online betting procedure is outrageous.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A  by the L.A. Times and UC-Berkeley previously this month exposed that voters who reported seeing the dueling attack ads about Props 26 and 27 suggested they were far more inclined to reject both costs, compared to those who [http://aurakingdom.wiki/index.php/User:GeraldMcCrae5 prevented] seeing any of the TV areas.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I think it's the unfavorable advertisements that have actually type of been turning voters away,&amp;quot; said Mark DiCamillo, the director of the UC-Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS) poll. &amp;quot;People who haven't seen the ads have to do with evenly divided, but individuals who've seen a great deal of ads are against it. So, the advertising is not helping.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Polls verify voter dissatisfaction&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The LA Times/UC-Berkley poll was among two significant studies that indicated the public's animus towards the sportsbook-sponsored costs.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In addition to that survey speculating that likely citizens were overwhelmingly opposed to the sportsbook-sponsored [https://homweb.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&amp;amp;wr_id=70886 legislature] by a 53% to 27% margin, the October 4 survey likewise exposed that Proposition 26 only had 31% of most likely voter favor.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The UC-Berkeley survey confirmed the [https://support.theopenroad.cloud/index.php?title=User:ChastityCarmona findings] of a September 15 poll carried out by the Public Policy Institute of California that had likely voters declining the sportsbooks' bill by a similarly decisive margin (the survey did not citizen opinion on Prop 26).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;More just recently, a SurveyUSA poll launched in the 2nd week of October provided a smattering of hope to native people by revealing that the assistance for Prop 26 had enhanced - albeit the survey carried a much smaller sized sample size than the PPIC and UC-Berkeley polls.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[https://www.dtfigures.co/index.php?route=journal3/blog/post&amp;amp;journal_blog_post_id=1 Tribes drew] in [https://www.uaplayer.net/2024/10/23/u-merezhi-opublikovano-pershi-testy-intel-core-ultra-9-285k/ broad union] of groups, sportsbooks left on their own&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;From the very beginning, the native people were figured out to play on enduring public sympathy for their traditional control of retail gambling establishments and horse tracks, where [http://120.77.174.2363000/tommiewilhoite legal gaming] might take location.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Over the course of the summer season, the No on 27 campaign saw 51 native people discover allies in the California State Association of Counties (CSAC), which represents all 58 counties in the state, the California League of Cities, both state [http://www.vokipedia.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:FranklynTier Democratic] and Republican celebrations and their top legal leaders, as well as the [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/nydiaboland/ major instructors'] unions.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Even organizations tailored towards helping the homeless - Step Up, Goodwill Southerm California, and the San Bernadino Corps of The Salvation Army - signed up with the No campaign despite the fact that they would have ostensibly gained from the sportsbooks' self-imposed [https://gummipuppen-wiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:Tanya25H92531 profits] tax.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For the most part, it was the significant sportsbooks (headlined by FanDuel, DraftKings, and BetMGM) that were left twisting in the wind from a basic absence of assistance - just three native people in the state wanted to back Prop 27.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Major League Baseball announced it was backing Prop 27 in August, tossing the sportsbooks a lifeline ... and acknowledging the advertising advantage to the 5 pro baseball franchises running in California.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But that was [https://music.1mm.hk/elimerewether basically] the level of operator assistance, apart from a couple of separated homeless shelter groups and the mayors of the towns of Oakland, Sacramento, Fresno, and Long Beach.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Most tellingly, California's major homeless shelter operators were never ever on board with the sportsbooks' &amp;quot;homeless options&amp;quot; messaging. In a September 22 statement provided by the &amp;quot;No on 27&amp;quot; committee, grave doubts were cast on the sportsbooks' bona fides regarding homelessness.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FranklynTier</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.vokipedia.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:FranklynTier</id>
		<title>Benutzer:FranklynTier</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.vokipedia.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:FranklynTier"/>
				<updated>2026-04-28T14:09:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;FranklynTier: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „[https://bmp.pw/luthervaux424 Bet9ja] News reports on the latest bonuses, promotions, and stories from Nigeria's top bookmaker. We help Nigerian bettors discov…“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[https://bmp.pw/luthervaux424 Bet9ja] News reports on the latest bonuses, promotions, and stories from Nigeria's top bookmaker. We help Nigerian bettors discover the latest sign-up offers and promotions, [https://gummipuppen-wiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:Tanya25H92531 including] [https://dengos.com.ua/uk/smartblog/9_kleim-steklo.html Bet9ja][http://inoueshigeki.com/2016/12/02/%e8%91%97%e6%9b%b8%e3%80%8c%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a1%e2%96%a0%e3%80%8d-2-2/hito-01/ 's YOHAIG] bonus code, which gives new users a [http://85.214.41.21949153/jefferymcclend first-deposit bonus] when they join. Everything we [https://flyinmadinah.com/5-most-beautiful-islands-in-asia/ publish] is tailored to [http://aurakingdom.wiki/index.php/User:GeraldMcCrae5 bettors] in Nigeria who want accurate, up-to-date insight into what [https://www.carismaweb.it/2022/05/24/hello-world/ Bet9ja] has available for [https://support.theopenroad.cloud/index.php?title=User:ChastityCarmona players].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Here is my [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/willianlero/ web blog] [https://www.charlot.gr/blog/best-leather-bags Bet9ja]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FranklynTier</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>